<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pixel Perfection is Impossible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timgittos.com/pixel-perfection-is-impossible/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timgittos.com/pixel-perfection-is-impossible?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=pixel-perfection-is-impossible</link>
	<description>professional bit pusher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:20:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timgittos.com/pixel-perfection-is-impossible/comment-page-1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timgittos.com/?p=216#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Thanks Joren. I know exactly what you&#039;re talking about with regards to the learning experience - the frameworks don&#039;t exactly use the most semantic class names to position their elements. Also, you&#039;ve just reminded me of another thing I didn&#039;t really like about using 960gs, which was all the manipulation I&#039;ve had to do with divs just to get elements working. Too many divs wrapping each other for the sake of layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Joren. I know exactly what you&#8217;re talking about with regards to the learning experience &#8211; the frameworks don&#8217;t exactly use the most semantic class names to position their elements. Also, you&#8217;ve just reminded me of another thing I didn&#8217;t really like about using 960gs, which was all the manipulation I&#8217;ve had to do with divs just to get elements working. Too many divs wrapping each other for the sake of layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timgittos.com/pixel-perfection-is-impossible/comment-page-1#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timgittos.com/?p=216#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Thanks Joren. I know exactly what you&#039;re talking about with regards to the learning experience - the frameworks don&#039;t exactly use the most semantic class names to position their elements. Also, you&#039;ve just reminded me of another thing I didn&#039;t really like about using 960gs, which was all the manipulation I&#039;ve had to do with divs just to get elements working. Too many divs wrapping each other for the sake of layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Joren. I know exactly what you&#8217;re talking about with regards to the learning experience &#8211; the frameworks don&#8217;t exactly use the most semantic class names to position their elements. Also, you&#8217;ve just reminded me of another thing I didn&#8217;t really like about using 960gs, which was all the manipulation I&#8217;ve had to do with divs just to get elements working. Too many divs wrapping each other for the sake of layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joren Rapini</title>
		<link>http://www.timgittos.com/pixel-perfection-is-impossible/comment-page-1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Joren Rapini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timgittos.com/?p=216#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Nice post Tim! I&#039;m glad you got inspired to write your opinion on frameworks. As many positive remarks as there were about frameworks on my blog, I&#039;m still not convinced enough to give one a try. I just think it would be an unnecessary learning experience to begin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Tim! I&#8217;m glad you got inspired to write your opinion on frameworks. As many positive remarks as there were about frameworks on my blog, I&#8217;m still not convinced enough to give one a try. I just think it would be an unnecessary learning experience to begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joren Rapini</title>
		<link>http://www.timgittos.com/pixel-perfection-is-impossible/comment-page-1#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Joren Rapini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timgittos.com/?p=216#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Nice post Tim! I&#039;m glad you got inspired to write your opinion on frameworks. As many positive remarks as there were about frameworks on my blog, I&#039;m still not convinced enough to give one a try. I just think it would be an unnecessary learning experience to begin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Tim! I&#8217;m glad you got inspired to write your opinion on frameworks. As many positive remarks as there were about frameworks on my blog, I&#8217;m still not convinced enough to give one a try. I just think it would be an unnecessary learning experience to begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timgittos.com/pixel-perfection-is-impossible/comment-page-1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timgittos.com/?p=216#comment-32</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly what I was trying to say with respect to designing for these differences. As long as the differences are consistent, only the really anal retentive will notice it&#039;s 2 or 3 pixels out in one browser as opposed to the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly what I was trying to say with respect to designing for these differences. As long as the differences are consistent, only the really anal retentive will notice it&#8217;s 2 or 3 pixels out in one browser as opposed to the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timgittos.com/pixel-perfection-is-impossible/comment-page-1#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timgittos.com/?p=216#comment-259</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly what I was trying to say with respect to designing for these differences. As long as the differences are consistent, only the really anal retentive will notice it&#039;s 2 or 3 pixels out in one browser as opposed to the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly what I was trying to say with respect to designing for these differences. As long as the differences are consistent, only the really anal retentive will notice it&#8217;s 2 or 3 pixels out in one browser as opposed to the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasquale</title>
		<link>http://www.timgittos.com/pixel-perfection-is-impossible/comment-page-1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasquale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timgittos.com/?p=216#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I think the key is consistency. If you can preserve a systematic spacing between elements to hold together some sort of uniformity, it&#039;ll usually end up balancing out cross browser. I hate dealing with browser compatibilities. I always pass it onto a friend to correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the key is consistency. If you can preserve a systematic spacing between elements to hold together some sort of uniformity, it&#8217;ll usually end up balancing out cross browser. I hate dealing with browser compatibilities. I always pass it onto a friend to correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasquale</title>
		<link>http://www.timgittos.com/pixel-perfection-is-impossible/comment-page-1#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasquale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timgittos.com/?p=216#comment-258</guid>
		<description>I think the key is consistency. If you can preserve a systematic spacing between elements to hold together some sort of uniformity, it&#039;ll usually end up balancing out cross browser. I hate dealing with browser compatibilities. I always pass it onto a friend to correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the key is consistency. If you can preserve a systematic spacing between elements to hold together some sort of uniformity, it&#8217;ll usually end up balancing out cross browser. I hate dealing with browser compatibilities. I always pass it onto a friend to correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
